Medium’s Free Expression Versus Misinformation Conundrum, Pt. 1

Is Umair Haque real, or just really good at rhetoric?

Prologue

Hello Medium, both the institution and users. Welcome to the free expression conundrum. Free expression is arguably the preeminent right of American citizenship, yet we often take it for granted. It’s critical importance derives from it being the foremost means of protecting the other rights we enjoy, without resorting to violence. The ability to freely express oneself is a great strength, and a necessity, for liberal democracy, but it comes encumbered with a vulnerability. Medium promotes itself as a champion of the strength side of the equation, the exchange of ideas from multiple viewpoints. Yet Medium fails to remediate, or even acknowledge, the vulnerability side of the equation, the propagation of faulty, harmful, even malignant ideas. Because of this oversight, Medium succumbs to the same ills which make typical social media a distraction and detriment to society.

One of the first defenses fans and managers of Medium will offer is that the site is not typical social media. They will claim immunity from the base ill of distracting users because there is a greater depth of engagement, and as Medium proudly proclaims, it is a source of “fresh thinking and unique perspectives.” The site is differentiated from pure social…